One of these polls is not like the other...
FCS Preseason Media Top 25
2012 Pts Pvs
1. North Dakota State (127) 14-1 3340 1
2. Montana State (1) 11-2 3079 5
3. Sam Houston State (5) 11-4 2941 2
4. Eastern Washington 11-3 2873 4
5. Villanova 8-4 2334 15
6. South Dakota State 9-4 2268 14
7. Central Arkansas 9-3 2244 10
8. Wofford 9-4 2089 7
9. Georgia Southern (1) 10-4 2002 3
10. New Hampshire 8-4 1920 13
11. Towson 7-4 1871 17
12. Appalachian State 8-4 1696 9
13. Illinois State 9-4 1657 8
14. Cal Poly 9-3 1646 12
15. Richmond 8-3 1384 18
16. Stony Brook 10-3 1178 11
17. Northern Iowa 5-6 1106 NR
18. Northern Arizona 8-3 988 20
19. James Madison 7-4 964 19
20. Montana 5-6 813 NR
21. Eastern Illinois 7-5 686 NR
22. Lehigh 10-1 587 16
23. Bethune-Cookman 9-3 514 22
24. Chattanooga 6-5 505 NR
25. Coastal Carolina 8-5 489 24
FCS Preseason Coaches Top 25
2012 Pts Pvs
1. North Dakota State (23) 14-1 645 1
2. Montana State (1) 11-2 591 5
3. Eastern Washington 11-3 549 4
4. Sam Houston State (1) 11-4 534 2
5. Wofford 9-4 450 7
6. Central Arkansas 9-3 428 10
7. South Dakota State 9-4 410 17
8. New Hampshire 8-4 386 13
9. Villanova 8-4 381 16
10. Illinois State 9-4 379 9
11. Cal Poly 9-3 348 11
12. Towson 7-4 347 15
13. Stony Brook 10-3 326 12
14. Richmond 8-3 274 18
15. James Madison ` 7-4 235 21
16. Northern Iowa 5-6 218 NR
17. Lehigh 10-1 198 14
18. Northern Arizona 8-3 196 20
19. Eastern Kentucky (1) 8-3 188 19
20. Bethune-Cookman 9-3 159 23
21. Coastal Carolina 8-5 140 24
22. Montana 5-6 135 NR
23. Eastern Illinois 7-5 120 25
24. Youngstown State 7-4 107 NR
25. Chattanooga 6-5 104 NR
According to the coaches of the Football Championship Subdivision, Georgia Southern — a program with three-straight trips to the semifinals of the playoffs under its belt — isn’t in the preseason top five.
Not the top 10, either.
In fact, Georgia Southern and Appalachian State, by virtue of “their transition to the (Football Bowl Subdivision),” aren’t eligible to be ranked in the FCS Top 25 coaches poll.
On the one hand, leaving those programs ineligible for a playoff berth or a conference title is a fair argument.
Georgia Southern is in the process of increasing its scholarships from 63 to 85, so the program currently offers more than anyone else who will be participating in the 2013 playoffs, giving the Eagles (and the Mountaineers) an arguably (though undecidedly) unfair advantage.
The reality is more like the Eagles have exactly the same number of scholarship players they would if they were not in transition, and they they’ve turned a bunch of partials into full rides on the road to becoming FBS compliant.
But, again, it’s a fair argument.
It’s also a fair argument by the Southern Conference that Appalachian State and Georgia Southern shouldn’t be eligible for the conference championship, either. After all, the SoCon champion receives an automatic bid to the playoffs, and the SoCon doesn’t want its auto bid going to a program that can’t use it.
Also, fair enough.
But the Eagles and Mountaineers being left out of the polls and the conference standings?
That’s a bit hypocritical.
First off, the Eagles are ranked in the preseason media poll — they’re No. 9, and they received one first-place vote — and so are the Mountaineers (No. 12). So why should they be in the media’s poll, but not the coaches?
Second, how can the SoCon leave ASU and GSU out of the conference standings, when wins and losses by the other conference programs against GSU and ASU still count?
If, say, Wofford loses to Georgia Southern, Wofford suffers a conference loss. If Wofford loses to ASU and GSU, but beats everybody else in the league, the Terriers will finish the season with a 6-2 record in conference play.
How is it possible that the games count, but the teams that won them don’t?
Let’s say Georgia Southern goes 8-0 in SoCon play, and Appalachian State goes 7-1 (just a hypothetical — not a prediction). What’s to stop the SoCon from allowing GSU and ASU to finish first and second (after all, they won the games, right?) and awarding the SoCon title and automatic bid to the third-place team? That seems fair, and it also seems like a better reflection of reality.
The problem is that the Southern Conference expects either GSU or ASU to finish at the top. And they should, because that’s pretty much the way it has gone down the past couple of years.
And the league doesn’t want to reward programs for deciding they’re too big to remain a member.
But the players had no role in the decision by Georgia Southern and Appalachian State to leave the Southern Conference for the Sun Belt. And since both programs are playing a SoCon schedule in 2013, both programs should have the opportunity to be recognized as the best team in the league. Not the champion, but the best team. And the SoCon is taking away that opportunity for no real, discernible reason.
As for the Top 25 coaches poll, there is somewhat of a precedent. Last year, Ohio State finished No. 3 in the Top 25 FBS media poll when it was the only undefeated team in the division. The Buckeyes were left out of the coaches poll.
But that’s because OSU cheated, and was being punished.
Georgia Southern and Appalachian State haven’t done anything wrong. All they’re doing is what they feel is best for their respective programs.
Apparently, progress deserves punishment, too.
So, as it stands, Georgia Southern is left with only one external goal — win every game and finish No. 1 in the media poll.
The Eagles can also gain some satisfaction if they’re able to beat some of the Top 25 teams in the coaches poll, and by forcing the SoCon to crown a champion with a mediocre record.
The SoCon and the FCS can try to make it look like the Georgia Southern Eagles and Appalachian State Mountaineers don’t exist in 2013, but they can’t stop them from winning.
Matt Yogus may be reached at (912) 489-9408.