By allowing ads to appear on this site, you support the local businesses who, in turn, support great journalism.
Panel calls for focus on fractions, other subjects to shore up nations math skills
Placeholder Image
    WASHINGTON — Schools could improve students’ sluggish math scores by hammering home the basics, such as addition and multiplication, and increasing the focus on fractions and some geometry, a presidential panel recommended Thursday.
    ‘‘Difficulty with fractions (including decimals and percents) is pervasive and is a major obstacle to further progress in mathematics, including algebra,’’ the panel, appointed by President Bush two years ago, said in a report.
    Because success in algebra has been linked to higher graduation rates and college enrollment, the panel focused on improving areas that are the foundations of algebra. Average U.S. math scores on a variety of tests drop around middle school, when algebra coursework typically begins. That trend also led the panel to focus on what’s happening before kids take algebra.
    A major goal for students should be mastery of fractions, since that is a ‘‘severely underdeveloped’’ area and one that’s important to later algebra success, the report states.
    ‘‘Students don’t know how to translate fractions into decimals or into percentages and they can’t locate fractions on a number line,’’ said panelist Tom Loveless, a senior fellow and education expert at the Brookings Institution, a Washington-based think tank.
    The report also says other critical topics — such as whole numbers and aspects of geometry and measurement — should be studied in a more in-depth way.
    When it comes to whole numbers, the report states that students must have a clear grasp of the meaning of basic operations of addition, subtraction, multiplication and division, among other things.
    With geometry and measurement, students should be able to find unknown lengths, angles and areas, the report says.
    ‘‘By building on a strong foundation of skills, students will be ready for rigorous courses in high school or earlier,’’ said Education Secretary Margaret Spellings, praising the report.
    Spellings and the panelists emphasized the need to boost U.S. students’ math performance because of the increasing need for high-level math skills in today’s workplace and because of the need to compete with workers from other countries for global jobs.
    U.S. students do particularly poorly on international tests. On one recent exam given to 15-year-olds in 30 industrialized countries, U.S. students posted an average score that was lower than the average in 23 of the other countries.
    In general, U.S. math curricula ought to be streamlined, according to the report.
    ‘‘There is I think a tendency in American curricula to cover too many things too shallowly,’’ Larry Faulkner, the panel’s chair and the former president of the University of Texas, said.
    The report takes a diplomatic stance when it comes to taking a position on the best methods to teach math to kids.
    In recent years, there has been a dispute over whether children should learn a sequence of basic skills in math, including multiplication tables and some memorization, or should understand the theory behind math problems and come up with solutions on their own.
    The report says both quick and effortless recall of facts and conceptual understanding of math are beneficial.
    In addition, the back-to-basics camp has tended to favor ‘‘teacher-directed’’ instruction, in which teachers do all the explaining, while the opposing side has backed ‘‘student-centered instruction,’’ in which students have the main responsibility for learning math — often through working with peers.
    The panel found students can benefit from both styles.
    ‘‘You need some element of discovery to allow kids to secure concepts in their minds, and you need to be able to have a reasonably efficient approach to be able to cover the material,’’ Faulkner said.
    Teachers need to emphasize that effort pays off, because too many kids feel that they are just not good at math and give up too early, according to the report.
    Faulkner said much more research is needed to understand why certain teachers are able to boost their students’ math skills. ‘‘Very little is known about these things, surprisingly little I think to this panel — given the importance of that question,’’ Faulkner said.
    The report did note that elementary- and middle-school teachers need more math preparation.
    It took aim at math textbooks, saying they are too long and lack coherence.
    Textbook publishers say they are trying to cover all the things in various state standards. Like for other subjects, each state sets its own math standards dictating what students should learn and when. Many critics say students would be better off with a single national standard, but the panel didn’t weigh in on that.
    The math panel’s report comes several years after another presidential panel outlined what ought to be done to improve reading performance. That panel stressed the importance of phonemic awareness in reading instruction and emphasized the need to combine a variety of reading approaches into teaching strategies. It also led to the creation of a federal reading program for schools serving low-income students.
    Spelling said she hoped Thursday’s report would lead to the creation of a similar math program. ‘‘I think, like the reading panel, this can be a seminal moment in math education,’’ Spelling said.

Sign up for the Herald's free e-newsletter