By allowing ads to appear on this site, you support the local businesses who, in turn, support great journalism.
Cybershaming and when it is OK to react to an offense
4303152417bdb2398d1357f88f14f076164fae2fd042b0228853a8e954e88b2d
Some ideas are worth arguing about. But before you express outrage about that "offensive" social media post, remember the "offender" is a human being. - photo by Marsha Maxwell
Internet outrage rages on, trampling victims as diverse as the conservative Christian owners of a small Indiana pizzeria who declared they would not cater a same-sex wedding to the hip, mixed-race South African comedian set to replace Jon Stewart on "The Daily Show."

Stewarts designated replacement, Trevor Noah, became center of controversy when people discovered some of the jokes he has made on Twitter were anti-Semitic and some mocked overweight women.

Noahs tweets, while inappropriate, raised questions about why politically incorrect statements create storms of outrage, especially on social media. The comedian defended himself via Twitter on March 31, writing, To reduce my views to a handful of jokes that didnt land is not a true reflection of my character, nor my evolution as a comedian.

Public shaming for unacceptable views doesnt come exclusively from the political left or right, and both liberals and conservatives engage in Internet outrage.

Christian blogger Timessa Lynn Leonard wrote for Relevant Magazine, In a world that encourages patience and acceptance, people sure can be touchy, particularly some Christians. Too many times, we can be like overeager watchdogs, sniffing out any morsel of what we deem as offensive, inappropriate or even heretical.

Its gotten to the point where its almost become trendy to be offended, Leonard wrote.

Christians offended by public discourse might remember Pauls statement about charity, found in Corinthians: Charity suffereth long, and is kind charity is not easily provoked.

Even within the Christian ideal of charity, Leonard acknowledges that sometimes speaking out about offenses is worthwhile.

We should get mad about injustices, and there are effective avenues for helping to make things right," she wrote. "But there are also a lot of petty disagreements and personal opinions that arent really worth spending time arguing about.

Leonard recommends six questions to ask before speaking out about a perceived injustice on social media:

Does it really matter?

Is it my fight to take on?

Am I seeking humility?

What dont I know?

Can I change this?

Should I change this?

When you come to a place where you have an insight or find an issue which is truly important to you, it is time to present your case, Leonard wrote. Its important to disagree with gentleness, she added.

Popular nonfiction writer Jon Ronsons new book, So Youve Been Publicly Shamed, chronicles the devastating effects of several high-profile cases of cybershaming. Ronson told the New York Times, Anybody who values ideology over human beings is somebody whos lost their moral compass.

He quotes one man, who lost his job when a coworker tweeted about offensive jokes he made during a conference, as saying, I know that Im just a kind of blank canvas for people to put their ideology onto.

Ronson told the Times that cybershaming is not the way humans should behave.

We have to rediscover kindness and nuance and empathy, because weve lost it, he said.
Sign up for the Herald's free e-newsletter