View Mobile Site

Parole board grants stay of execution

ATLANTA (AP) — The state Board of Pardons and Paroles on Monday granted a stay of execution of up to 90 days to a man convicted of killing a Savannah police officer in 1989.
    Troy Davis, 38, had faced a Tuesday execution date prior to the decision by the board after less than an hour of deliberation.
    The stay means the execution will be on hold while the board weighs the evidence presented as part of Davis’ request for clemency. It must issue a decision by Oct. 14, but if it denies clemency before then it could lift the stay, a spokeswoman said.
    Earlier Monday, lawyers for Davis spent more than five hours pleading with the board to grant a reprieve to their client.
    Prosecutors were given a chance during the closed-door hearing to rebut the request for clemency for Davis, who had been scheduled to be executed Tuesday at 7 p.m. for the Aug. 19, 1989, murder of Officer Mark MacPhail.
    The board’s options included commuting Davis’ death sentence to life in prison or granting a stay of his execution while it considers the issues.
    ‘‘We are no longer under the gun and we can present the rest of our innocence case,’’ Davis lawyer Jason Ewart said after the board’s decision.
    But the officer’s widow, Joan MacPhail, said in an interview that she was disappointed by the decision.
    ‘‘I believe they are setting a precedent for all criminals that it is perfectly fine to kill a cop and get away with it,’’ she said.
    Before the decision, Ewart said he was glad the board ‘‘engaged the facts, and without respect to the media or anything else.’’
    Among the people who argued for clemency for Davis during Monday’s parole board hearing were friends, family and U.S. Rep. John Lewis, an Atlanta Democrat and civil rights icon. Five witnesses who testified at trial spoke to the board on Davis’ behalf, Ewart said.
    Among those present for the state at the parole board’s offices were the victim’s widow and mother and the district attorney for Chatham County. They have argued that Davis received a fair trial and has had plenty of appeals, all of which have failed.
    ‘‘I believe police did their job correctly and found the right man,’’ the slain officer’s son, Mark MacPhail Jr., told reporters after his family addressed the board in private.
    The younger MacPhail said he told the board what it was like to grow up without a father. The son, now 18, was less than 2 months old when his father was killed.
    He said the clemency hearing ‘‘brought back many, many memories of bygone years.’’
    A jury convicted Davis, 38, for the murder of MacPhail, 27, who was shot twice after he rushed to help a homeless man who had been assaulted.
    The shooting took place in a Burger King parking lot next to the bus station where MacPhail worked off-duty as a security guard.
    Davis’ lawyers said seven of nine witnesses who testified at his trial that they either saw Davis shoot the officer, saw him assault the homeless man before the shooting or heard Davis later confess to the slaying have since recanted or contradicted their testimony.
    But Joan MacPhail said police arrested the right man and she was saddened by the parole board’s decision to grant a stay.
    ‘‘By making us wait, it’s another sock in the stomach,’’ she said. ‘‘It’s tearing us up.’’
    Also Monday, Davis’ lawyers filed an appeal with the state Supreme Court of an earlier decision by a Chatham County judge to deny a stay of Davis’ execution. A decision on that request was pending, and it wasn’t clear whether the parole board decision would make the high court decision moot.
    Besides the affidavits of recanting witnesses, Davis’ lawyers noted that other affidavits from three people who did not testify at Davis’ trial say another man, Sylvester Coles, confessed to killing the officer after Davis was convicted. After the shooting, Coles identified Davis as the killer.
    Prosecutors argued that most of the witness affidavits, signed between 1996 and 2003, were included in Davis’ previous appeals and should not be considered new evidence.
    Davis’ lawyers said they have been hindered over the years at getting courts to consider their new evidence because of restraints in the law.
    In particular, they have complained about the Anti-terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, a 1996 law that limits the circumstances under which federal judges may grant habeas corpus petitions in state court cases. Congress passed the law to limit the seemingly endless legal wrangling that typically precedes executions.
    The Associated Press has been unable to locate Coles for comment, and Ewart has declined to say if he knows Coles’ whereabouts. Coles was not at the parole board hearing Monday.
    Davis testified at trial that he was present at the scene of the officer’s shooting, but denied that he was involved.

Interested in viewing premium content?

A subscription is required before viewing this article and other premium content.

Already a registered member and have a subscription?

If you have already purchased a subscription, please log in to view the full article.

Are you registered, but do not have a subscription?

If you are a registed user and would like to purchase a subscription, log in to view a list of available subscriptions.

Interested in becoming a registered member and purchasing a subscription?

Join our community today by registering for a FREE account. Once you have registered for a FREE account, click SUBSCRIBE NOW to purchase access to premium content.

Membership Benefits

  • Instant access to creating Blogs, Photo Albums, and Event listings.
  • Email alerts with the latest news.
  • Access to commenting on articles.

Please wait ...