View Mobile Site

House to cast landmark abortion-related vote on contraceptive grants overseas

    WASHINGTON — Shaking a pillar of President Bush’s foreign aid policy, the House moved Thursday toward passing legislation that would allow contraceptive grants to groups overseas that offer abortions.
    The proposal is likely to be vetoed swiftly by Bush and upheld by conservative lawmakers, who say no assistance of any kind should be given to organizations that promote or offer abortions.
    ‘‘If we provide either cash or in-kind contributions or anything of value to pro-abortion organizations in other countries, we empower, enrich and enable them to expand abortion,’’ said Rep. Christopher Smith, R-N.J.
    The legislation is intended by the new Democratic majority to crack open debate on a foreign policy it says is failing badly. Initiated by President Reagan in 1984 at a population conference in Mexico City, the policy bars any assistance to organizations abroad that perform or promote abortion as a method of family planning.
    Democrats say an unintended consequence is an alarming shortage of contraceptives, particularly in poor rural areas.
    The bill would help ‘‘reduce unintended and high-risk pregnancies and abortions . . . and save the lives of mothers,’’ said Rep. Nita Lowey, who chairs the House appropriations panel that oversees the foreign aid budget.
    ‘‘It is simply not enough to say you support family planning, so long as the current restrictions remain in law,’’ Lowey, D-N.Y., said.
    Lowey initially drafted legislation in such a way that would have guaranteed grants to any group so long as the assistance included funding for contraceptives. The measure was included in a $34.2 billion bill that pays for State Department operations and foreign aid in 2008.
    In the face of stiff opposition to the plan, Lowey drafted an amendment that would restrict the aid to U.S.-donated contraceptives.
    Republicans still bristled at the proposal because they said the donation would free up resources for groups to provide abortions. They also said it would undermine the intention of the Mexico City policy, which is intended to pressure organizations to abandon abortion services.
    ‘‘The Mexico policy exists to draw a bright line between U.S. family planning policy and abortion,’’ said Rep. Joe Pitts, R-Pa. ‘‘However, it appears that there are some out there who wish to blur this line, (which) is what leads to coercive abortions and forced sterilizations.’’
    Smith and Bart Stupak, D-Mich., proposed alternative legislation intended to reinforce the existing policy. While Republicans were doubtful they had enough votes to pass Smith’s measure, they were confident they could sustain a presidential veto.
    In a statement released Tuesday, the administration said the president would veto any legislation ‘‘that weakens current federal policies and laws on abortion.’’
    Democrats say statistics show sexually transmitted infections and abortions are on the rise in areas where U.S. contraceptive assistance is unavailable. According to Population Action International, which supports the Democratic bill, Ghana’s rates rose after a prominent family planning group in the country was denied U.S. assistance.
    Bush policy has had a destabilizing impact on country-led family planning programs and undermined decades of health care provision by leading national non-governmental organizations, the group says.
    The funding bill attracted a slew of other amendments on foreign affairs. The House voted 355-69 to restart the Iraq Study Group to conduct another assessment of the war.
    It also adopted by voice vote a proposal by Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, R-Fla., to redirect $20 million initially intended for the U.N. development program, under fire for its aid to North Korea. The House also was on track to adopt a measure to restrict money for the U.N. Human Rights Council.
    Ros-Lehtinen said the votes are evidence of ‘‘palpable bipartisan frustration with the slow pace of U.N. reform and the alarming deterioration of the U.N.’s commitment to protect human rights around the world.’’

Interested in viewing premium content?

A subscription is required before viewing this article and other premium content.

Already a registered member and have a subscription?

If you have already purchased a subscription, please log in to view the full article.

Are you registered, but do not have a subscription?

If you are a registed user and would like to purchase a subscription, log in to view a list of available subscriptions.

Interested in becoming a registered member and purchasing a subscription?

Join our community today by registering for a FREE account. Once you have registered for a FREE account, click SUBSCRIBE NOW to purchase access to premium content.

Membership Benefits

  • Instant access to creating Blogs, Photo Albums, and Event listings.
  • Email alerts with the latest news.
  • Access to commenting on articles.

Please wait ...