View Mobile Site

Gates says U.S. not winning war in Iraq, gains panel recommendation as Pentagon chief

WASHINGTON — Robert Gates won approval by a Senate panel Tuesday to be the next defense secretary after telling the senators the U.S. is not winning the war in Iraq and there could be a ‘‘regional conflagration’’ if the country is not stabilized.
    At a Senate confirmation hearing that was long on praise for Gates and short on criticism, the man President Bush picked to replace Donald H. Rumsfeld said he is open to new ideas about correcting the U.S. course in Iraq. He said the war would be his highest priority if confirmed as expected.
    A vote by the full Senate could come Wednesday and is virtually certain by week’s end.
    In a closed-door meeting following five hours of open testimony, the Senate Armed Services Committee voted 21-0 to recommend approval of Gates’ nomination, said panel chairman John Warner, R-Va.
    If confirmed, Gates said, he planned to visit U.S. commanders and troops in Iraq ‘‘quite soon.’’
    Gates, 63, said he believes Bush wants to see Iraq improve to the point where it can govern and defend itself and that may require a new approach. ‘‘What we are now doing is not satisfactory,’’ Gates said.
    ‘‘In my view, all options are on the table in terms of how we address this problem in Iraq,’’ he said. He did not commit to any specific new course, saying he would consult first with commanders and others.
    Asked directly by Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., whether the U.S. is winning in Iraq, Gates replied, ‘‘No, sir.’’ He later said he believes the United States is neither winning nor losing ‘‘at this point.’’
    At the outset of an afternoon session of questions about Iraq and other subjects, Gates began by telling the committee he wanted to amplify on his remark in the morning about not winning in Iraq. He did not withdraw the remark but said, ‘‘I want to make clear that that pertains to the situation in Iraq as a whole.’’
    He said he did not want U.S. troops to think he believes they are being unsuccessful in their assigned missions.
    ‘‘Our military wins the battles that we fight,’’ Gates said. ‘‘Where we’re having our challenges, frankly, are in the areas of stabilization and political developments and so on.’’
    At the White House, press secretary Tony Snow was pressed by reporters about Gates’ answer that the U.S. is not winning in Iraq — one that seemed to be in conflict with the president’s own position.
    Snow said that Gates’ testimony, taken in its entirety, showed he shares Bush’s view that the U.S. must help Iraq govern and defend itself.
    ‘‘I know you want to pit a fight between Bob Gates and the president, it doesn’t exist,’’ Snow told reporters.
    Gates was noncommittal on questions about whether and when to begin a U.S. troop withdrawal, saying it ‘‘depends on the conditions on the ground.’’ He also said that if confirmed he would go to Iraq soon to consult with U.S. commanders.
    Asked later whether announcing a specific troop withdrawal timetable would send a signal of U.S. weakness, Gates said it ‘‘would essentially tell (the insurgents) how long they have to wait until we’re gone.’’
    The hearing was nonconfrontational, with occasional hints of humor from Gates. Much of the questioning from panel members was focused on whether he would provide independent advice to Bush, and the former CIA director assured the committee that he would not shirk from that duty.
    He said he did not give up his position as president of Texas A&M University and return to Washington to ‘‘be a bump on a log.’’
    Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., a likely 2008 presidential candidate and an advocate of increasing U.S. troop strength in Iraq, asked whether Gates believes the U.S. had too few troops at the outset of the war in 2003.
    ‘‘I suspect in hindsight some of the folks in the administration would not make the same decisions they made,’’ including the number of troops in Iraq to establish control after the overthrow of Saddam Hussein’s regime, Gates said.
    He also told Levin he believes a political solution in Iraq is required to end the violence.
    The confirmation hearing came amid intensifying pressure for a new approach, reflecting the outcome of the Nov. 7 elections that put Democrats back in control of both houses of Congress.
    U.S. deaths in Iraq have topped 2,900, and questions persist about whether Iraq will devolve into all-out civil war.
    ‘‘Our course over the next year or two will determine whether the American and Iraqi people and the next president of the United States will face a slowly but steadily improving situation in Iraq and in the region or will face the very real risk, and possible reality, of a regional conflagration,’’ Gates said.
    Bush has repeatedly rejected the idea of a quick U.S. withdrawal from Iraq and said he wants to keep U.S. forces there until Iraq is able to govern and defend itself without being a haven for terrorists.
    ‘‘It seems to me that the United States is going to have to have some kind of presence in Iraq for a long time ... but it could be with a dramatically smaller number of U.S. forces than are there today,’’ Gates said.
    Meanwhile, Bush had an in-person preview of a prestigious blue-ribbon panel’s recommendations for a new way forward in Iraq. Talking to reporters, Snow said that commission co-chairman James A. Baker III merely gave a glancing briefing.
    Gates, who served on the commission until his nomination was announced by Bush on Nov. 8, said he did not know what the panel would recommend.
    ‘‘It’s my impression that frankly there are no new ideas on Iraq,’’ he said.
    Gates said at one point that ‘‘long-term stability in Iraq will be influenced by Syria and Iran and said the U.S. government should ‘‘look at ways to bring them to be constructive. How we do that, I don’t have any specific ideas at this point.’’
    Of al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden, he said: ‘‘The way we’ll catch bin Laden eventually, in my view, is that just as in the case of Saddam Hussein, one of his people will turn him in.’’
    An issue that dogged Gates during his final years at the CIA — the Iran-Contra affair — arose at Tuesday’s hearing only after about four hours on other matters. Levin, who was among 31 senators who voted against Gates to become CIA chief in 1991, raised it.
    During his CIA confirmation hearing in 1991, Gates faced doubts that he had told all he knew about the 1986 affair, in which the Reagan administration secretly sold arms to Iran in hopes of freeing hostages in Lebanon, then used profits from the sales to help the Contra rebels in Nicaragua against congressional orders.
    Levin noted the doubts about the reliability of Gates’ memory on this issue, but he also said it was important to know that the independent counsel who investigated Iran-Contra is now supporting Gates’ nomination.
    ———
    Associated Press Writer Philip Elliott contributed to this report.

Interested in viewing premium content?

A subscription is required before viewing this article and other premium content.

Already a registered member and have a subscription?

If you have already purchased a subscription, please log in to view the full article.

Are you registered, but do not have a subscription?

If you are a registed user and would like to purchase a subscription, log in to view a list of available subscriptions.

Interested in becoming a registered member and purchasing a subscription?

Join our community today by registering for a FREE account. Once you have registered for a FREE account, click SUBSCRIBE NOW to purchase access to premium content.

Membership Benefits

  • Instant access to creating Blogs, Photo Albums, and Event listings.
  • Email alerts with the latest news.
  • Access to commenting on articles.

Please wait ...